Memory and Grave Markers

I recently found out that the Taj Mahal (Fig. 1) is actually the burial site of Queen Mumtaz Mahal. I have always been enthralled by the Taj Mahal because of its beauty and monumental size. I find Mausoleums an interesting way of commemorating the dead because they are a statement about memory. The buildings become a more permanent way of remembering the deceased, and can become a testament to an individual's social status and wealth. Other ancient examples are Mausoleums of elites such as Augustus and Halicarnassus (Fig. 2).

In modern societies mausoleums are still used to a small degree, but more conservative monuments such as headstones are put in place. This can be a result of social trends, restrictions in place in cemeteries, and financial means. Grave markers are associated with memory, and they differ depending on who you want to remember you.

For instance, scattering ashes, planting a tree with ashes, and private grave markers are all for individuals wanting to be remembered by their family and friends. More public grave markers and elaborate grave markers (such as sculptures that were seen in the 1800s) create a lasting memory of that person for the community. There are grave markers that have photos and some even have screens for videos that are meant to be viewed by the public. Location is key. Grave markers in cemeteries are displayed to the public, while private grave markers are for friends and family. There are also modern grave markers to state figures. For instance, Lenin wanted to be remembered by Russia, and was embalmed and is still on display in Moscow.

I wouldn't want to be on public display like Lenin or Jeremy Bentham (see my earlier post below), but I think the idea of a monumental grave marker is really interesting in terms of your memory lasting for a long time. In many cases the remains have disappeared but the monuments still stand. 



Image 1



Image 2