What are the ancestor stones from Madagascar?
They are used in tombs and monuments. They are the possessions of the
ancestors, as stone is a sacred material. The living do not use stone, but they
use wood instead. The analogy Parker Pearson and Ramilisonia developed compares
the use of stone in both monuments to connect them to
ancestors.
There are no doubt similarities between
modern burial traditions in Madagascar and ancient burial traditions from
Neolithic England seen through the standing stones. However, an analogy between
the two is not that applicable in my opinion. It is possible for similar ideas
to arise independently, but the causes of those similarities are most likely
completely different. The comparison is between two vastly different cultures
separated by both time and geography. Analogies can be useful between two
contemporaneous cultures to show cultural preferences and customs. However, we
do not know that much about Neolithic England. We cannot verify our
information.
For instance, we know that the stones in
Madagascar are for ancestors, however we cannot confirm this in Neolithic
England. There are theories interpreting Stonehenge as everything from a
calendar to an alien monument. The monument’s main purpose was most likely much more
complex, and probably changed through time. We cannot test these ideas because
it was constructed in the Neolithic. In Madagascar we can consult the actual
people performing the ritual surrounding the remaining burial site. Therefore
any direct comparison between the two is restricted.
An aerial view of Stonehenge.
No comments:
Post a Comment